Common Cross Browser Incompatibilities in Web Apps 

Today, one of the most challenging issues in the digital world is how to make things work consistently across browsers. Web developers and testers have to deal with browser differences brought about by different rendering engines and the level of support for modern web technologies. Such inconsistencies will drive a poor user experience as what works seamlessly in one browser can be broken or behaves differently in another browser.

This is a major concern because cross-browser issues directly affect user satisfaction and the building of trust. Those who experience problems with the layout, functionality, or performance of a site are likely to leave it and possibly never come back. For business concerns, this could mean the loss of potential customers, their diminished credibility, and reduced income. Thus, cross-browser compatibility is not only a technical concern, but a business one too.

DevOps Vs Agile Development

Table of Contents

Understanding Browser Incompatibilities

These problems are caused by a number of technical differences between browsers. From rendering to feature support, each browser behaves differently, creating problems that developers have to overcome.

Rendering Differences

Probably the difference in web page rendering is one of the leading causes of cross-browser incompatibilities. There are four major browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Edge), each of them having its specific rendering engine (Blink, Gecko, WebKit and EdgeHTML respectively). Each of the rendering engines may interpret HTML, CSS, and JavaScript in a somewhat different way. For example, Chrome and Firefox might visually render the CSS Grid correctly, while Internet Explorer breaks or misaligns it because this is not entirely supported. These differences can create a visual problem or a functional one. Therefore, each browser needs to be tested and adjusted.

Visual Discrepancies

Visual differences arise when browsers interpret the same styling rules with different ways, leading to inconsistent layouts and designs. It could be a difference in how padding or margins are calculated or fonts are rendered. Something that might look polished in Chrome may look off in Safari, with elements shifted or misaligned. Commonly, CSS resets or normalisation stylesheets are used to combat these differences, but thorough cross-browser testing still remains an important part for catching subtler variations.

Feature Support Variability: The Technological Gap

Modern browsers are in constant evolution, so they keep implementing new features in HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript that greatly enhance interactivity and performance. On the other hand, legacy browsers, such as older versions of Internet Explorer, do not support most of the innovative features introduced by modern browsers. For example, a modern browser may fully support Flexbox or CSS Grid, while old browsers have partial or even non-existent support.

This gap in technologies can be a reason for broken layouts, missing functionality, and user frustration. The solution to these issues more often than not means writing fallbacks or polyfills so the users using older browsers still can access at least core functionality with only a minimal level of degradation.

JavaScript Engine Divergence

JavaScript plays a critical role in modern web applications. The problem is that different browsers use different JavaScript engines; therefore, JavaScript execution may differ between browsers. This inconsistency can generate instances where bugs or other performance issues occur in one browser and not in others.

Performance Disparities

JavaScript runs at the heart of every interactive and dynamic web application. However, all the various different engines that run JavaScript – V8 by Chrome, SpiderMonkey by Firefox, and JavaScriptCore by Safari – run differently in performance and centrally in their ways of execution; thus, scripts could also behave differently from one browser to another. Something which works perfectly fine in one browser could even lag or produce errors in another.

For example, though most modern browsers support JavaScript async and await functions, which provide non-blocking code execution, they may throw an error in older versions, resulting in broken functionality. That variability requires thorough testing across browsers and fallbacks where necessary.

Compatibility Issues

More often than not, JavaScript bugs behave differently in different browsers. A function that works perfectly well in Chrome might yield a silent error in Safari and a completely different bug in IE. This inconsistency make debugging hard. Using tools like T-Plan’s automation testing framework to test JavaScript functionalities across browsers can be lifesaver, allowing bugs be identified and resolved way faster.

Debugging Techniques

The problem is that debugging of JavaScript in various browsers is complicated because each browser reports or handles the errors in different ways. Each browser has its own different set of developer tools, but problems which appear in one browser might not be visible in another. T-Plan’s browser testing tools will enable testers to help with identifying and debugging JavaScript issues by providing detailed logs and snapshots of the behaviour in different browser environments. This makes it easier and faster for developers to fix bugs and ensure equal performance across all platforms.

What is Cross-Browser Compatibility

Cross-browser compatibility is the condition whereby a web application behaves consistently across a wide range of browsers. This means that the experience for a single user will make no difference whether one opens up a site in Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or any other browser out there; the layout would remain consistent, functional, and centric to performance.

For instance, a web application that looks fine and works in Chrome might have some usability issues in Safari – where elements may load incorrectly or user interactions fail. Multi-browser testing helps in the detection of such discrepancies early on in the development phase.

Why Cross Browser Compatibility is Important

Cross-browser compatibility is not only a technical requirement but also business need. It directly affects user experience, reach, and business performance. Let’s break down precisely why it’s so important.

Maximizing User Reach

Cross-browser compatibility is essential for reaching a wider audience reach. This because users access the web through various browsers, and each of these have a different market share. Ensuring your web application performs consistently within a large spectrum of popular browsers-like Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge-allows you to ensure maximum engagement and reduce the risk of shrugging off potential users who prefer less common browsers or older versions.

Enhancing User Experience

Maintaining user satisfaction and trust is vital, and this can be done by providing a seamless user experience. Inconsistent rendering or functionality in different browsers can frustrate users enough to abandon your site. A consistent experience regardless of browser choice will enhance usability and engagement, thus conversation rates are more likely to increase.

Improving SEO and Accessibility

Your web app will be favoured by search engines if it offers consistent user experience across all browsers, this in turn should positively impact your SEO rankings. As well, consistent functionality also ensures that the site is accessible to users with disabilities. Making your site compatible with assistive technologies like screen readers which work differently across different browsers will broaden your audience and meet accessibility standards.

Brand Reputation

Inconsistencies across various browsers will damage your brand’s credibility, as users expect the same level of consistency in whatever platform they use. A web application that works faultlessly in any browser shows that your brand is professional and credible. Cross-browser compatibility keeps the positive brand image because it shows your commitment to delivering something finished and oriented towards users’ needs.

Reducing Development and Maintenance Costs

Identifying and addressing cross-browser compatibility issues upfront in the development phase will save you from costly fixes later on. Using automation testing tools like T-Plan Robot, potential problems are caught before they can affect user experience, and thus relatively fewer issues pop up once a website has gone live. This proactive approach will smoothen the development process and lower the long-term maintenance costs while ensuring quality across browsers.

Common Cross Browser Compatibility Issues and Solutions

Cross-browser compatibility issues can arise from several sources. Identifying and resolving these issues in a timely manner is essential for delivering a seamless user experience.

CSS Inconsistencies

When styling rules are interrupted differently between browsers it’s normally down to CSS inconsistences. To address this, developers can use CSS reset stylesheets that unify the default styles. T-Plan’s Robot can be used to automate CSS testing, which makes the detection of inconsistencies much faster.

JavaScript Compatibility

Different interpretation of JavaScript might lead to broken functionality in some browsers. Testing of JavaScript functionality in different environments with the use of T-Plan Robot will ensure consistency of your web app behaviour.

HTML Parsing

HTML parsing discrepancies will break layouts or, even worse, cause content to be missing. Verification of your HTML through HTML validation tools and automatic testing with T-Plan Robot ensures that your web app behaves consistently across all browsers.

Vendor Prefixes

Some CSS properties require a vendor prefix, like -webkit or -moz, for them to work in a variety of browsers. Testing across multiple browsers using T-Plan Robot makes sure that prefixes are appropriately set.

Font Rendering

Fonts often display differently in different browsers. To minimize these differences, it’s best to stick with web-safe fonts or standardised web fonts. T-Plan’s image-based testing features ensure that font display will be the same for every browser.

Box Model Differences

Browsers may calculate box sizes differently.  Applying the box-sizing property standardises these calculations across the browsers, and tests written within T-Plan Robot will tell you what else, if anything, is different.

Form Element Styling

By default, browsers have their own styles for all form elements, including buttons and input fields. It is up to the developer to make them consistent by adding custom styles and scripts. Automated tests of T-Plan Robot verify the behaviour of form elements.

Performance Issues

Performance can vary wildly between browsers. Optimising resources such as images, scripts, and CSS further improves performance. T-Plan’s parallel test execution underlines browser-specific bottlenecks in performance.

Viewport and Media Queries

Responsive design can behave differently in different browsers due to how media queries are dealt with. T-Plan Robot’s responsive design testing ensures your layout will be functional and visually appealing on all devices and across all browsers.

How to Ensure Cross Browser Compatibility

  1. Define the Scope – Analyse your user base and target most common browsers and devices. This would leverage testing effort and maximise coverage in target environments.
  1. Leverage Automated Browser Testing – Perform cross-browser testing with frameworks such as Selenium, Cypress, or Playwright- integrated with T-Plan Robot to streamline the process.
  1. Responsive Web Design Testing – Make your web app responsive across devices with the help of T-Plan testing tools, which simulate different screen sizes for ensuring smooth working on both desktop and mobile platforms.

Best Practices for Ensuring Cross Browser Compatibility Testing

Cross-browser testing can be cumbersome; but with the proper approach, it could be streamlined. Here are some best practices to follow:

Plan and Prioritise

Apply analytics to determine what browsers and devices are most critical to your user base. T-Plan Robot’s automation can help you prioritise tests for those environments.

Use Standardised Code

Following web standards for HTML, CSS, and JavaScript ensures that your code will be as cross-browser friendly as possible. T-Plan Robot can verify if standardised code behaves correctly across all browsers.

Conclusion 

Cross browser compatibility testing ensures a consistent and reliable user experience across different browsers and devices. T-Plan Robot’s advanced automation features streamline this process, making it more efficient and effective. Improved compatibility leads to broader user reach, better SEO, and enhanced user satisfaction. T-Plan helps achieve these goals by automating and simplifying testing. 

Utilise T-Plan Robot today for comprehensive cross-browser testing to ensure your web applications are universally accessible and perform optimally.

Recent Posts

mobile accessibility testing

How to Effectively Conduct Mobile Accessibility Testing 

Think about this: How many times a day does someone access their smartphone? Now, imagine opening your favourite app, but it’s not possible to see half the screen, or the buttons are way too small to accurately tap. This sounds frustrating, but unfortunately is the bitter reality for millions of disabled users worldwide.   That’s why

Read More »

Alpha Vs Beta Testing 

Alpha and beta testing are considered two major phases in developing software, confirming that the product has reached stability, functionality, and usability before its release. Alpha testing is performed internally by developers and QA teams, which emphasises finding and fixing major bugs in controlled conditions. It lets teams validate the core features and makes certain

Read More »

Book your FREE demo

Get in touch with our award-winning team today and unlock the power of our Automated Visual UI testing tool for your business.

Book your FREE demo

You’re just one step away from saving time & money – get in touch today.

  • No code access required
  • Visual UI testing tool
  • iOS and Mac compatible
  • All platforms supported
  • Mimics real time user experience
  • Record and playback function
  • Award winning support